City journal darwinist dating
"In accepting evolution as fact, how many biologists pause to reflect that science is built upon theories that have been proved by experiment to be correct, or remember that the theory of animal evolution has never been thus approved."Through use and abuse of hidden postulates, of bold, often ill-founded extrapolations, a pseudoscience has been created.
But we also want to apply this method of learning truth to the claims of evolution. That which is called the "scientific method" tries to locate events that can happen again.Norms should be based on that which will result in the best good for all people in the long run.An outstanding example of such a list of standards is to be found in the Ten Commandments (Exodus 20:3-17).When a scientist with such standards conducts laboratory and field research, he is more likely to arrive at accurate conclusions.By repeating an experiment, a measurement, or an observation, a scientist tries to find the cause of an event.At times, the scientist may change one part of the experiment slightly when repeating it again.
What happens may tell him even more about the situation. These would be moral principles of right and wrong; the best are to be found in the Bible.
When he publishes a report of his findings, other scientists will try to repeat the experiment and see if the same results occur. By accepting and acting on those principles, the mind is trained to think carefully and more accurately.
Instead of determining and acting on the basis of selfish aspirations, emotional impulses, and desires for the supremacy, the individual becomes motivated by a concern to do right because it is right, and to learn truth even though it may be unpleasant.
He becomes more objective, more willing to accept right conclusions.
Because of this, he is in a better position to recognize them.
Obviously, this second pattern of arriving at truth is keyed to normative standards.